Last week, I blogged about the results of a study showing an association between vital exhaustion and weight gain.
This blog posting prompted Sharon Kirkey (award-winning health journalist and diligent reader of my blog) to explore this issue further by actually talking to the researchers themselves. Her article appeared yesterday via the Canwest News Service and contains far more details than I bothered to report in my blog.
For e.g. Sharon lists the actual questions Bryant and colleagues used to explore the presence of vital exhaustion. I found them most interesting so I list them below:
- Do you often feel tired?
- Do you wake up repeatedly during the night?
- Do you have the feeling that you have not been accomplishing much lately?
- Do you believe that you have come to a 'dead end'?
- Do you lately feel more listless than before?
- Do little things irritate you more than they used to?
- Does it take more time to grasp a difficult problem than it did a year ago?
- Do you have increasing difficulty in concentrating on a single subject for long?
While to me none of these questions seem particularly specific and are likely to get a "yes" response from a lot of people (hey, even I have to say "yes" to some), I guess when you have to say "yes" to most or all of them, you are probably not hopping around like the Energizer Bunny or scrambling to follow diet plans.
Sharon quotes me as saying: "Nobody is claiming all of obesity is exhaustion, but if people are clearly eating more than they need the question is not (just) how to get them to stop, but why, exactly, are they doing that. Maybe you're losing your job. Or you're overworked. Or it's some private issue that needs to be addressed. You don't fix obesity by giving people a copy of Canada's food guide. You have to try to understand what it is that's contributing to the weight gain."
Exactly! Obesity is a symptom of overeating, which in turn is a symptom of something else that's going on: it can be that you simply lack the knowledge about healthy nutrition or caloric content of foods, but it can also be a symptom of emotional (e.g. depression, vital exhaustion) or biological (e.g. MC-4 receptor defect) issue, medications (e.g. clozapine) or any number of other reasons I can think of.
Always remember: overeating (and/or sedentariness) is not a diagnosis - overeating (and/or sedentariness) is a symptom!
AMS
Edmonton, Alberta
Friday, July 18, 2008
Overeating is a Symptom
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Research Canada Looks at Science and Media
Yesterday, I blogged about how the Australian TV-media provides a rather nutrition-focused view of the obesity epidemic.
This raises the issue of how public media, especially in Canada, actually reports on science, especially obesity.
Those of you interested in this topic may wish to look at the just released report on Research Canada’s first Media Science Forum, Communicating Health Research in an Era of Headline News, which examined how best to communicate research findings and research issues to Canadians, elected officials and other stakeholders.
One full session was devoted to media discussion of obesity - the event was strongly supported by the Canadian Obesity Network.
The full report is available here.
A webcast of the event is available here.
Diane Finegood (picture), Director of CIHR-INMD summed the key issues around obesity as follows:
"There are barriers to really getting the change and momentum for change, as the public still sees obesity as a personal responsibility. In reality, it is a mix of societal and systemic issues. There will be no policy changes without societal demand. Scientists need to work together with the media to create this. "I have little to add.
AMS
Edmonton, Alberta
Monday, May 19, 2008
Media on Obesity: Its Your Diet!
Clearly, judging by the daily media stories on obesity, one can hardly claim that this topic is being ignored.
But despite the barrage of reports, does the media really contribute to a better public understanding of obesity? What is being reported? And perhaps more importantly, what is not being reported?
I don’t have stats for Canadian media, but a recent study from Australia, if applicable to Canada, certainly raises a few flags.
Catrioni Bonfiglioli from the University of Sydney conducted an analysis of 50 representative TV news and current affairs items about overweight and obesity broadcast by five free-to-air television channels in New South Wales between May and October 2005.
According to the results published last year in the Medical Journal of Australia, the researchers found that the media tends to overwhelmingly focus on obesity as a problem of individuals with poor nutrition as the major cause.
I found the type of story themes noteworthy and have therefore copied them here:
Modern medical miracles: e.g Lapband surgery saves lives
Surprise or quirky news: e.g. wine may help with weight loss
Individual success stories: e.g. workplace weight-loss winner
Hunting the Holy Grail of weight loss: e.g. a diet that works
Danger in the familiar: e.g. coffee more fattening than a Big Mac
Health scare: e.g. obesity epidemic a danger to all
David and Goliath battle: e.g. McDonald’s sues activists for libel
Debunking myths: e.g. ten weight-loss myths debunked
The elixir of life: e.g. eating less and moving more is the key to living longer
Big bucks - obesity is big business: e.g. $3 mill spent on children’s survey
Government in bed with business: e.g. US government acts to stop fast food industry being sued over obesity
Celebrity: e.g. sportsman calls for activity to stop childhood obesity
Food fight: conflicts: e.g. ABC celebrates debate on food issues
Junk food TV advertising to blame: e.g. health experts and parents attack junk food advertising
Parents to blame: e.g. parents of overweight children accused of neglegt
Pester power: e.g. battle to get kids to eat healthy
Don’t brand fat children: e.g. labeling children as obese is cruel
Obesity is genetic: e.g. obesity runs in the family
The most common factor blamed for obesity was nutrition (72% of items) while inactivity (including computer games) was blamed in only 14% of items.
Individuals were blamed in 66%, industry in 8%, and society in 6%.
Overall, the general tenor of the media reports were on obesity essentially as a result of individual lifestyles and presented solutions that focused on personal responsibility for individual change – i.e. the rhetoric of “choice”.
Whether intended or unintended, clearly the Australian media reports take the spotlight off the idea that government and industry may share a responsibility for reshaping the obesogenic environment.
The focus on individual nutrition sure takes the focus off structural issues such as need to work long hours in sedentary jobs, poor urban planning, long commutes, lack of public transportation and other issues that may be key to solving the obesity epidemic, but are less comfortable to policy makers (and other stakeholders) than simply blaming the “victims”.
By promoting the idea of individual responsibility and individual solutions, the media certainly plays its part in promoting the widespread bias and discrimination against people with overweight and obesity by choosing which topics to report about and which to ignore.
I can only wonder if an analysis of the Canadian press’ reporting on obesity would reveal similar results.
AMS
Edmonton, Alberta